In May 2015, Bernie Sanders, a 73 year old Senator from a small, rural state – Vermont – launched an unlikely bid for the Democratic presidential nomination. Fourteen months later, he conceded defeat to Hillary Clinton. But not before he had chalked-up 13 million votes, 23 caucus and primary victories, and nearly 2000 pledged conference delegates, far exceeding both his own initial expectations and those of the Beltway press.
Sanders’ success in the Democratic primaries should have set alarm bells ringing at the top of the Democratic party. He was a political outsider with little support on Capitol Hill. He was adept at using social media to communicate simple messages to a mass audience. He was a critic of free trade. He spoke the language of economic populism. He charged the “donor class” with “rigging the system” against middle and low income Americans.
Had Sanders been the Democratic nominee, he may or may not have beaten Donald Trump to the White House in November. But his remarkable rise from the political outskirts, and the speed with which his insurgent campaign gathered pace, were early indications of just how dramatic and unpredictable the 2016 general election was going to be. It was the year in which all the old rules of bourgeois politics were cast aside by an electorate increasingly appalled by traditional bourgeois politicians.
Our Revolution: A Future To Believe In is a fascinating overview of the Sanders phenomenon. It is part-memoir, part-campaign diary, and part-manifesto. Sanders – a functional and uncomplicated writer – recalls his hardscrabble upbringing in Brooklyn, as part of a Jewish immigrant family, and the radicalising effects of his time at the University of Chicago, which exposed him, at the start of the 1960s, to the reality of racism and poverty in one of America’s major urban centres.
His political career began as mayor of Vermont’s capital, Burlington (population 42,000), in 1980, where he experimented with “socialism in one city.” In the 1990s, he acted as the state’s lone voice in the House of Representatives. In 2007, he was elected to the Senate. His status as an independent member of Congress taught him how to navigate a gridlocked legislature, the default setting for congressional politics in the US in the mid-‘90s, and to “work across the aisle.” In contrast to Jeremy Corbyn, whose tenure as Labour leader has been marked by a series of unforced media gaffes, he learned how to express socialist ideas clearly and (almost) inoffensively, in a style uniquely accessible to America’s conservative political mainstream.
Before deciding to run for president, Sanders spent weeks testing the ground, travelling across the country talking to union reps, immigration reform activists and other radical voices within the Democratic coalition. He was surprised by the high levels of enthusiasm for his prospective candidacy. A groundswell of anti-Clinton resentment was already forming. Among grassroots Democrats, the party’s left-leaning base, there was no great appetite for a Clinton dynasty, and no appetite at all for a return to the policies of ‘90s Clintonism.
Sanders focused his pitch on Hillary Clinton’s glaring political weaknesses. He reminded people of Bill Clinton’s record in office – a record Hillary never meaningfully disavowed. Over eight years between 1992 and 2000, the so-called “New Democrats” repealed Glass-Steagall (a crucial piece of Wall Street regulation), cut welfare payments for poor families, fought efforts to legalise gay marriage, and signed NAFTA, a free trade agreement that killed thousands of American manufacturing jobs. Sanders wouldn’t let Hillary escape the legacy of the Third Way. In his eyes, she was the most prominent and unrepentant representative of a liberal establishment that had overseen what he called “the decline of the American middle class.”
In Our Revolution, Sanders is keen to stress that he didn’t run any negative ads against Clinton and, to his credit, once she had secured the nomination, he embarked on an exhaustive tour of the rustbelt states making the case for a Clinton presidency (or at least arguing vociferously against a Trump one). But the raw fact of his popularity, which was greatest among Americans under the age of 35, revealed a deep fissure on the American left. The compromises struck in the ‘90s by “modernising” progressive leaders – with the financial industry, the free market, and the ultra-rich – were no longer acceptable to large numbers of progressive voters.
Sanders understood that. Clinton didn’t. Clinton may have won the Democratic primaries and then, five weeks ago, by a healthy margin, the national popular vote, but her refusal to deviate from a blandly triangulated message – a barely updated reiteration of Barack Obama’s milquetoast “hope and change” boosterism – was fatal. It alienated just enough natural Democrats in just enough key counties to tip Trump over the threshold of victory in the electoral college.
Sanders doesn’t get everything right. He acknowledges the role misogyny played in undermining Clinton’s ability to “connect” with many rightwing Americans, but underestimates the extent to which racism – white America’s fear of becoming a minority on a rapidly shifting demographic map – helped mobilise sizeable chunks of Trump’s support. Moreover, Our Revolution contains a long list of ambitious leftwing demands, from nationalised healthcare to the abolition of student debt. The book was clearly written before Trump was elected, on the assumption that Clinton would succeed Barack Obama in the Oval Office. He can park those demands for now. For American leftists and liberal centrists alike, the next four years are going to be an exercise in damage limitation.
This article is a review of Our Revolution: A Future To Believe In by Bernie Sanders.